In a stunning decision on April 17, a federal judge ruled that Google’s online advertising business constitutes an **illegal monopoly**.
This landmark verdict marks the **second time** courts have deemed the tech giant guilty of breaching antitrust laws within the past year.
In response to the ruling, Google has announced plans to **appeal**, asserting that the court’s rationale is based on outdated frameworks.
The recent decision, delivered by U.S. District Judge **Leonie Brinkema**, highlights the **manipulative practices** within Google’s advertising ecosystem that connects website publishers with advertisers. In her opinion, the violations of antitrust law are both damning and systemic.
According to Brinkema’s **[115-page ruling](https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/court-filings/united-states-of-america-et-al-v-google-llc-memorandum-opinion-2025.pdf)**, the judge articulated: “For over a decade, Google has tightly integrated its publisher ad server and ad exchange through contractual policies and advanced technology. This strategic manipulation has enabled the company to cement and guard its monopoly power in these two crucial markets.”
The **[Associated Press](https://apnews.com/article/google-illegal-monopoly-advertising-search-a1e4446c4870903ed05c03a2a03b581e)** reveals that the roots of this monopolistic structure trace back to 2008, when Google acquired the online advertising powerhouse **DoubleClick** for a staggering $3.2 billion. Initially approved by regulators, this acquisition has since been recognized as a pivotal step that enabled Google to manipulate ad pricing across platforms.
The U.S. **Justice Department** contends that Google dominantly controls every corner of the digital ad ecosystem—encompassing the platforms used by website publishers, the technology utilized by advertisers, and the ad exchanges facilitating real-time auctions between buyers and sellers.
Google is poised to appeal the ruling, with **Lee-Anne Mulholand**, the company’s vice president of regulatory affairs, asserting that “publishers have a myriad of choices; they choose Google due to our ad tech tools remaining simple, cost-effective, and efficient.”
As reported by the **AP**, Google’s legal team contends that the government’s case relies on obsolete concepts, arguing that the market for advertising has significantly evolved over the past decade.
This recent ruling marks the **Justice Department’s second win** against Google within a year. Last August, U.S. District Judge **Amit Mehta** ruled Google held an illegal monopoly on search capabilities, while earlier in 2023, a federal jury found the Google app store similarly illegal. The implications of these rulings could reshape the landscape of digital advertising and app distribution for years to come.
The unfolding events are sure to continue, with both parties bracing for a protracted legal battle as Google pushes back against these significant decisions.
**Read Next:**
Image: Shutterstock
**[UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK.](https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9spja3yaad2&utm_source=yahoo)** Get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to innovative tools and strategies to maintain an edge in the markets.
Keep updated with the latest stock analysis from Benzinga.
This article **[Google Declared An Illegal Monopoly For The Second Time In A Year, Digital Ad Network Under Fire](https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/25/04/45029649/google-declared-an-illegal-monopoly-for-the-second-time-in-a-year-digital-ad-network-under-fire)** originally appeared on **[Benzinga.com](https://www.benzinga.com)**
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.