Inside the Mechanics of DOGE: A Conversation with Sahil Lavingia
When we think of efficiency in government operations, the narrative often strays into convoluted territory. Yet, Sahil Lavingia, a former staff member of the ambitious DOGE initiative, pulls back the curtain on his brief yet impactful tenure at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This candid discussion sheds light on the inner workings of this cost-cutting initiative backed by none other than Elon Musk.
The Allure of Joining DOGE
A Unique Opportunity
Lavingia’s journey into DOGE began with a sense of excitement and optimism. Attracted by the notion of transparency and innovation in government, he joined DOGE with high hopes. "I believed in the mission to create efficiencies," he admits. But his experience turned out to be a mixed bag, veering into secrecy despite the initiative’s promise of openness.
The Reality Check
While there were initial ambitions to reshape governmental operations, reports soon emerged about controversial practices—software engineers and political loyalists entering agencies, accessing sensitive data, and even orchestrating mass layoffs. Lavingia found himself amidst an organization that seemed lost in its own narrative, designed to reduce government overheads but at a significant human cost.
Behind the Scenes: A Candid Reflection
Insights and Learnings
Lavingia’s time at DOGE, albeit short—just 55 days—was rich with insights. "The raw potential was there," he reflects, "but the execution felt disjointed." His contributions began on March 17, 2025, when he was sworn in by the VA’s Assistant Secretary for Human Resources, Mark Engelbaum. But as days turned into weeks, it became increasingly clear that the operational shifts came with ethical dilemmas.
The Culture of Secrecy
Despite its founding principles, the culture at DOGE often felt opaque. Lavingia recalls discussions that were at times overshadowed by uncertainty and confusion. "Decisions were being made without clear communication, which made it difficult to navigate my role," he explains.
The Bigger Picture: DOGE and its Fallout
The Impact on Government Workforce
With a backdrop of rising tension and layoffs, DOGE’s journey wrapped itself in controversy. The initiative wasn’t just reshaping efficiency; it was also reshaping government employment landscapes—leading to thousands of workers lost. It begs the question: at what point do efficiency and productivity come at the cost of human capital?
A Lesson in Transparency
Lavingia’s experience at DOGE serves as a poignant lesson about the need for transparency in government operations. “Without trust, any initiative aiming for efficiency is bound to falter,” he posits, underlining the importance of open communication channels.
Conclusion: A Complex Legacy
As DOGE continues to navigate its messy waters under the spotlight of public scrutiny, the narrative serves as a cautionary tale. The ambition to streamline government processes is admirable, but it’s the manner of execution that frames its legacy.
In wrapping up his thoughts, Lavingia encourages a renewed focus on the human aspect of governance. “Efficiency doesn’t equal effectiveness without considering the people involved,” he notes, making it clear that while good intentions might pave the road to initiatives like DOGE, the implementation must also prioritize the individuals at its heart.
For in-depth analyses and the latest discussions, explore more from Planet Money through their Instagram or podcasts.
Lavingia’s reflections illuminate a critical dialogue about efficiency in government—one well worth considering as we strive for progress without losing sight of vulnerability in the systems we create.
