Ajith Kumar’s film feels like an epic fan edit.

Franetic / Movie Reviews / Ajith Kumar’s film feels like an epic fan edit.
Share This Post

Ajith Kumar’s Good Bad Ugly: A Fan’s Dream or a Cinematic Nightmare?

It’s always a tall order to critique a film that thrives on emotional fervor rather than logical coherence. Good Bad Ugly (GBU), starring the beloved Ajith Kumar and directed by Adhik Ravichandran, is precisely that: an ode to Ajith’s fanbase that at times feels like an extravagant fan edit gone rogue.

A Journey into Fanboy Haven

From the very first frame, GBU makes no bones about its intentions. The trailers and promotions promised a unique cinematic experience, yet I found myself emerging from the theater as if I had wandered into a fervent fan convention rather than a movie screening. Suspending disbelief is merely a prerequisite here; you almost feel compelled to abandon logic entirely—and watch it dance to the rhythm of Ajith Kumar’s greatest hits.

Substance Meets Star Power

At its core, GBU is a film crafted for die-hard fans who will relish the countless tributes to the actor’s illustrious career. However, it’s difficult to overlook the film’s shallow narrative, which resembles a feeble sketch rather than a polished script. While the storyline may be thinner than a razor blade, it’s devoid of any sharpness, leaving spectators more bewildered than entertained.

The central character, AK, played by Ajith Kumar, is shrouded in mystery. We learn that he’s a notorious gangster from Mumbai, yet much of his backstory remains obscured. His wife, Ramya (expertly portrayed by Trisha), is an emblem of the film’s contradictions—a law-abiding embassy worker who naïvely stumbles into a world rife with crime. It becomes apparent that GBU isn’t a film for those who thrive on logical coherence; it’s a vibrant mashup designed for fans who revel in vibe over narrative.

Emotional Dilemmas with a Twist

The plot pivots around AK’s promise to his son—a promise followed by a twist that leaves viewers grappling with confusion. After serving 17 years in prison to protect his family’s secret, the film leads us through a labyrinthine narrative where AK must rescue his teenage son from the clutches of the law. Yet, despite its potential for emotional depth, what unfolds instead is an array of painfully convoluted dialogues that serve more to confuse than clarify.

Imagine this: two villains and a back-and-forth debate over options that culminates in Ajith’s character proclaiming, “A + B = C.” The riddle of algebra is comically disarming yet frustratingly perplexing, drawing chuckles reminiscent of a Prime Minister’s unexpected foray into academic territory.

The Vibe Over Substance Strategy

While Director Adhik ingeniously tries to build AK’s persona, the film compensates for its lack of substance by overloading it with vibrant “vibe” elements. Classic hits punctuate action sequences with slick editing, creating a sensory overload that leaves little room for narrative reflection. The film even introduces quirky, imaginative weaponry that might have challenged the crew’s entire creative capacity.

Despite a promising start in the first half, where the film attempts to pull viewers in with unexpected twists, the second half devolves into outrageous parody. AK morphs into “Red Dragon,” an over-the-top character with ostentatious claims of international credentials and unexpected connections to Hollywood. At this point, what could have been a gripping narrative is sidelined by a bizarre mashup of pop culture references and fan fiction, leaving viewers questioning, “Is this for real?”

Character Development: A Missed Opportunity

The characters in GBU reveal a distressing lack of depth. Ajith’s AK is a jigsaw puzzle with missing pieces; we are fed glimpses of his iconic looks from previous films, such as Amarkalam, Billa, and Dheena, yet we never truly understand who he is. Trisha’s portrayal of Ramya often feels one-dimensional, reduced to the trope of a wife who merely nags and worries.

Even the film’s villains, including Arjun Das, lack the strong agency expected from a formidable antagonist. With the inclusion of actor Jackie Shroff, his mere presence raises intrigue, but he ultimately serves no substantial role, making viewers wonder about the casting choice.

Musical Magic Amidst Chaos

Despite the narrative flaws, Good Bad Ugly boasts an impressive musical score courtesy of GV Prakash, whose background music manages to captivate in spite of the surrounding chaos. His compositions add an enchanting layer to the experience, albeit overshadowed by the movie’s failings.

Ultimately, Good Bad Ugly isn’t truly a film in the traditional sense; it feels more like a glorified PowerPoint presentation of Ajith Kumar’s fan moments, strung together by sheer star power and edited to mimic an Instagram reels tribute.

For Ajith devotees, this cinematic spectacle may serve as a cultural pilgrimage. Yet for the casual viewer seeking narrative depth, prepare yourself for an arduous two-and-a-half hours—an experience that oscillates between indulgent fandom and a chaotic journey into the mind of an unrestrained fan creativity.


Disclaimer: This review is independent and not commissioned by anyone associated with the film. Both TNM and its reviewers hold no business affiliations with the film’s producers or any cast members.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore

Check all Categories of Articles

Do You Want To Boost Your Business?

drop us a line and keep in touch
franetic-agencia-de-marketing-digital-entre-em-contacto