Why Marketers Struggle to Measure True Performance
by Stephen Spratley, Co-Founder of Marketing Armor
Understanding Return on Investment (ROI) has become a critical aspect of the marketing landscape. Despite the relentless pressure from executives for crystal-clear financial metrics, the reality is that ROI remains one of the most misinterpreted and often inaccurately calculated indicators in business.
The ROI Conundrum: Why Numbers Can Deceive
The challenge for marketers is palpable. They often find themselves ensnared in the ROI trap—misattributing conversions or overly fixating on short-term results, thereby obscuring the true impact of their brand-building endeavors. This leads to data that can misdirect strategies and investments.
If marketing leaders want to make smart investment decisions, a fundamental shift in performance measurement is essential.
The Attribution Challenge: Who Gets Credit for a Sale?
One of the foremost hurdles in measuring ROI is attribution modeling. Today’s consumers rarely follow a linear path to purchase. Instead, they navigate through a maze of touchpoints—be it social media ads, SEO content, email campaigns, or referral links—before arriving at a decision.
Yet, many marketers still cling to outdated models like first-touch attribution, which gives all credit to the very first interaction, and last-touch attribution, which attributes all credit to the final interaction.
For instance, imagine a customer reads several blog posts, attends a webinar, and then clicks on a Google ad. Should that ad receive full credit for the sale? Relying solely on first- or last-touch attribution means marketers miss a crucial part of the journey, leading to incorrect investments in channels that may not deserve it.
A more comprehensive approach lies in employing blended attribution models that utilize multitouch tracking and predictive analytics. Tools like Google Analytics 4 (GA4) and HubSpot can offer nuanced insights into how each channel interacts and influences the buyer journey.
The Short-Term vs. Long-Term ROI Debate
Another prevalent pitfall is the overemphasis on short-term ROI at the expense of long-term brand value.
While quick tactics such as paid ads can yield immediate results—easily calculable in terms of Cost Per Click (CPC)—long-term strategies like SEO and content marketing often take time to demonstrate their full value. This temporal mismatch makes it difficult for decision-makers to justify investing in longer-term initiatives.
Consider the contrast: a Google Ads campaign might bring in conversions almost instantly, but that effect vanishes once funding ceases. In contrast, a well-optimized SEO article can take months to gain traction, yet it may continuously drive traffic for years—well beyond any immediate ad spend. Moreover, a robust brand reputation can boost direct traffic, enhance organic referrals, and improve customer retention—all of which significantly contribute to long-term ROI.
However, because brand equity is harder to quantify, many organizations underappreciate investments in organic marketing, thought leadership, and public relations. The solution? Striking a balance between immediate revenue-generating tactics and sustainable brand-building efforts.
The Hidden Costs That Distort ROI
Another layer of complexity in calculating true ROI comes from hidden costs. Take a hypothetical business that spends $10,000 on Facebook ads and garners $30,000 in revenue. On the surface, that translates to a stunning 200% ROI—but this figure is misleading.
What about:
- Ad agency fees?
- Landing page development costs?
- Email nurturing sequences?
- Customer support expenses?
- Product return and refund scenarios?
When these hidden costs are factored in, the ROI may plummet.
A more reliable method involves tracking Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) in relation to Customer Lifetime Value (CLV). This approach allows businesses to analyze the costs of acquiring a customer against the revenue that customer can generate over time, enabling marketing investments to align more closely with sustainable growth.
Rethinking ROI: What Marketers Should Track Instead
If relying solely on ROI isn’t sufficient, what should marketers focus on? Here’s a list of key performance indicators (KPIs) that can yield a richer understanding of marketing effectiveness:
- Marketing Efficiency Ratio (MER): Total revenue divided by total marketing spend, providing a bird’s-eye view of profitability.
- Customer Lifetime Value: Represents the long-term revenue potential generated by an individual customer.
- Customer Acquisition Cost: The comprehensive cost incurred to gain a new customer, encompassing all marketing and sales-related expenses.
- Retention Rate and Churn Rate: Key metrics that gauge marketing’s role in fostering customer loyalty.
- Pipeline Velocity: Measures how swiftly leads convert into paying customers, illuminating marketing’s influence on sales efficiency.
By shifting the focus from traditional ROI metrics to a more holistic view, organizations can make informed, data-driven decisions that pave the way for sustainable growth.
Final Thoughts: Escape the ROI Trap
Marketing transcends immediate revenue generation; it’s about nurturing relationships, establishing trust, and positioning a brand for enduring success. The biggest error marketers can make is chasing short-term sales at the expense of the broader context.
To break free from the ROI illusion, businesses must:
- Adopt advanced attribution models for a clearer impact assessment of their efforts.
- Balance short-term and long-term investments to avoid placing too much significance on quick wins.
- Account for all acquisition costs to enhance clarity regarding profitability.
- Utilize broader performance metrics beyond ROI for a comprehensive understanding of marketing strategies.
It’s time to advance past outdated ROI formulas and embrace smarter, more strategic methods of performance tracking.
For more insights, visit the Forbes Communications Council to connect with industry leaders and elevate your marketing strategy.
