Critics’ Take on 28 Years Later: A Haunting Return
After more than two decades, director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have ventured back into the chaotic world of the infected with 28 Years Later, the eagerly anticipated sequel to 2002’s iconic 28 Days Later. This cinematic reunion hit the London premiere with much fanfare, and the early reviews are streaming in—bringing in an impressive 95% rating on Rotten Tomatoes from 78 critiques.
What Critics Are Saying: Early Impressions
As the film gears up for its official release this Friday, let’s delve into the buzz surrounding 28 Years Later and see what film critics have to say.
The Hollywood Reporter: A Relevant Commentary
David Rooney from The Hollywood Reporter emphasizes the film’s relevance in today’s socio-political climate. He argues that “one of the chief rewards of 28 Years Later is that it never feels like a cynical attempt to revisit proven material merely for commercial reasons.” Instead, the film serves as an intriguing exploration of allegorical themes that resonate with contemporary issues.
Rolling Stone: Expanding the Universe
David Fear in Rolling Stone praises Boyle for preserving the original’s integrity while expanding its universe. He states, “The filmmaker and his collaborators have also deepened their vision of a world on the brink, adding in strong elements of British folk horror.” This commentary hints at a nuanced exploration of societal anxieties, layered within the horror.
Entertainment Weekly: A Stylistic Blend
In his review for Entertainment Weekly, Jordan Hoffman describes Boyle’s unique storytelling approach. He notes, “Stylistically, Boyle throws a lot of things into a blender here, and somehow it all works.” The film’s bold visual tapestry intertwines various styles, amplifying its emotional impact through a dynamic editing style.
New York Magazine: A Mixed Bag
Bilge Ebir from New York Magazine expresses some skepticism regarding the film’s structure, suggesting that it may feel episodic: “Despite several moving moments… 28 Years Later is choppy, muddled, strange, and not always convincing.” Yet, he acknowledges its distinctiveness, remarking, “But I’m not sure I’ll ever forget it.”
Indiewire: A Humanizing Approach
Meanwhile, David Ehrlich of Indiewire explores the film’s ambitious themes. He mentions, “28 Years Later is increasingly preoccupied with the idea that the difference between ‘us’ and ‘them’ is only a matter of perspective.” His take appreciates how the film dares to humanize the infected, apropos to our era of confusion.
I09: Questions and Revelations
Germain Lussier from I09 highlights the film’s intricate world-building, pondering existential questions about humanity’s remnants: “What would 28 years without humans do to an ecosystem?” He notes that the film not only entertains but compels viewers to reflect on broader philosophical inquiries within its horror context.
The Associated Press: Depth Behind the Horror
Jake Coyle of The Associated Press critiques the film’s disjointed visuals but finds deeper philosophical musings within it. He writes, “Buried in here are some tender reflections on mortality and misguided exceptionalism.” This delicate balance makes 28 Years Later more than just a horror film; it’s a chilling yet soulful coming-of-age narrative.
Vanity Fair: Poignancy Amidst Horror
Lastly, Richard Lawson from Vanity Fair notes the film’s tonal shift: “Three quarters of the way through, 28 Years Later slows the horror to become a rumination on death’s inevitability.” This contemplative approach, set against a horrifying backdrop, transforms the film into a meditative piece on humanity’s resilience.
Final Thoughts
With a blend of horror, socio-political commentary, and existential musings, 28 Years Later is shaping up to be a film that not only terrifies but also resonates on a profound level. As critics weigh in, it’s clear that this sequel has reignited discussions about the horror genre and its reflections on contemporary society. Mark your calendars—28 Years Later opens this Friday, promising a cinematic experience that is both thrilling and thought-provoking.
