Good Bad Ugly: A First-Of-Its-Kind, 141-Minute Mashup to Remember
If you’re a devoted Ajith Kumar fan who can’t help but shout “Kadavuley Ajithey” at the screen, then this review may not hold much relevance for you. For those willing to carve out two and a half hours for this film, buckle up for an exploration of Good Bad Ugly, a cinematic experience that feels more like a glorified fan service compilation than a cohesive narrative.
The Premise of Good Bad Ugly
In Good Bad Ugly, we meet AK, aka Red Dragon, a feared gangster who makes a radical choice: he surrenders to protect his family from the enemies he has accumulated over his criminal career. Fast-forward 18 years, and while AK attempts to rebuild his life, the past catches up with him in an array of challenges that test his resolve. However, the execution leaves much to be desired, yielding a film that often feels more like a list of references than a compelling story.
Comparisons to Past Hits
Watching Good Bad Ugly may evoke memories of the 2022 film Aarattu, which, despite its mixed reviews, at least had a semblance of a storyline. This film, on the other hand, bombards the audience with an overabundance of references to Ajith Kumar’s career—names, character nods, and iconic dialogues that often seem disconnected from any meaningful context. It’s akin to enduring those long, drawn-out introduction sequences for a single character, devoid of substance and rich storytelling.
Fan Service Run Amok
The film’s approach to fan service is akin to an endless music video, as claimed by director Adhik Ravichandran. His earlier works, such as Trisha Illana Nayanthara and its sequel, exhibited a style that doesn’t lend itself well to a feature-length film. The dialogue is overwhelmingly filled with nods to Ajith’s past roles, often feeling forced and superficial rather than naturally woven into the fabric of the narrative. It begs the question: Is modern cinema losing its narrative cohesiveness in favor of catering to fandom?
Visual Style and Aesthetics
Abhinandan Ramanujam employs warm, saturated colors that give Good Bad Ugly a music-video aesthetic but can also serve as a distraction from the lackluster storytelling. The visual style tries to dazzle the audience, creating a false sense of depth that doesn’t exist in the script.
Character Development and Performances
While Ajith Kumar shines with his signature charisma, showing glimpses of his dashing persona in various flashy outfits, the supporting characters fare less well. Arjun Das, known for his impressive villain roles, is reduced to a mere caricature, lacking the nuanced portrayal his talent deserves. Trisha, in her role as Ramya, barely registers on-screen, leaving audiences wondering about her purpose in the story.
A Defining Moment
One particularly bewildering scene involves Arjun Das’s character—a member of an infamous WhatsApp group of villains—who instantly sends a picture of AK, causing immediate exits from the group. Such scenes elicit laughter rather than the intended tension, highlighting the film’s chaotic grasp on its tone.
Final Thoughts on Good Bad Ugly
In conclusion, Good Bad Ugly attempts to pay homage to Ajith Kumar but spirals into a self-indulgent spectacle that alienates as many viewers as it aims to please. While the star’s fanbase may find enjoyment in the nostalgic references, those seeking a hearty narrative and developed characters may find themselves disenchanted. Ajith’s desire to distance himself from the adoration of his fans—requesting not to call him Thala or Kadavul—makes his participation in this venture puzzling.
Investing in Good Bad Ugly may offer nostalgic joys for hardcore fans, but for everyone else, the allure of this 141-minute long mashup might just wear thin.
For a deeper dive into cinematic critiques and movie reviews, explore more at Lensmen Reviews.
