WARNING: This review contains spoilers.
Discover the Complexities of Materialists
In the vibrant tapestry of modern cinema, Celine Song’s latest film, Materialists, attempts to unravel the intricate dynamics of love, wealth, and societal expectations. While her earlier work, Past Lives, garnered admiration for its fresh perspective on the immigrant experience, Materialists has led me to a rather disheartening conclusion: our creative wavelengths simply do not align.
A Misaligned Connection
Perhaps it was the moment when Greta Lee’s Nora chose to engage with her childhood love, Hae Sung, in Korean while ignoring her husband, Arthur, at the bar. This pivotal scene left me reeling, and I found it difficult to recover from that reaction. Nevertheless, my anticipation for Materialists remained intact. After all, the idea of a sophisticated female voice navigating the romantic realm is not just refreshing; it’s vital. The film has garnered nearly universal acclaim, hinting at a story worth delving into.
The Setup: Expectations and Reality
The film opens with Lucy (played by Dakota Johnson), a successful matchmaker in the bustling landscape of New York. Her role is to manage the often unrealistic expectations of her clients—most notably the women who appear to be in search of the perfect partner. “I’m not building a man in a lab,” Lucy reminds one client, highlighting the prevalent desire for a partner who is not only wealthy and tall but also impeccably handsome. In essence, her clients often seem to want an archetype rather than a human being.
Enter the Unicorn
Her life takes an intriguing turn at a wedding where she meets Harry (played by the ever-charismatic Pedro Pascal). He is everything her clients desire: rich, tall, and handsome. Their flirtation begins, with Harry unknowingly becoming a client in Lucy’s eyes. They share moments of connection, raising questions about romantic ideals. And then, into this mix enters John (portrayed by Chris Evans), Lucy’s ex-boyfriend—a struggling actor living with two messy roommates, who symbolizes the “loveable loser” trope. Their past relationship—soured by Lucy’s material concerns—resurfaces, creating a complex love triangle that viewers are eager to navigate.
Twists and Turns
As Lucy embarks on her romantic journey with Harry, the narrative takes a darker turn when one of her clients, Sophie (masterfully portrayed by Zoe Winters), faces a traumatic assault by the man Lucy had set her up with. This pivotal incident serves as a supposed catalyst for Lucy’s personal awakening and raises questions about her professional integrity and the societal pressures surrounding relationships.
Despite the distressing nature of Sophie’s experience, the film believes to convey that love should triumph over superficial constraints. However, Lucy’s emotional response to Sophie’s trauma seems somewhat disconnected from her own journey, raising questions about the overall message.
A Disconnected Narrative
Despite moments of profound acting throughout the film, I found it difficult to fully engage with the emotional undercurrents. Johnson’s portrayal of a woman doubting her desirability felt unconvincing, and the casting of Evans as the "loser" boyfriend felt misaligned with the character’s budding star status. It’s a narrative that struggles to bridge authenticity and fantasy.
Materialists operates in a rich cinematic world, but it sometimes falters under the weight of its ambitions. While the performances are commendable, the emotional connections feel somewhat eclipsed by the film’s formulaic structure.
Final Thoughts
Ultimately, Materialists is a striking exploration of societal norms and personal growth, but it might miss the mark for those seeking a deeper emotional resonance. Despite my disconnect, its charm and craft may resonate with viewers drawn to stories of romantic complexities wrapped in glossy packaging.
For more insights into the film industry, explore Baltimore Magazine’s Arts & Entertainment section.
