Barack Obama’s Impact on the Democratic Party: Exploring ‘Fight’ by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes
The latest exposé, “Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House,” dives deep into the tumultuous political landscape shaped by former President Barack Obama. Newly released, the book authored by political journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes offers a provocative thesis: Obama may have effectively fractured the Democratic Party he once represented.
Obama’s Candidacy: A Shift in Loyalty
Upon leaving the White House, Obama aimed to distance himself from a party that many insiders claim he left in disarray. The book posits that unlike his predecessors, such as Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, Obama’s allegiance was not primarily to the Democratic Party. Rather, he allegedly garnered support from a specific group of “black professionals” during his campaigns, raising questions about his commitment to the broader party infrastructure.
The Birth of Organizing for Action and Its Consequences
One of the key criticisms highlighted in “Fight” revolves around Obama’s establishment of Organizing for Action (OFA). This nonprofit, created shortly after his re-election in 2012, aimed to promote his legislative priorities but, according to the authors, ended up competing with the Democratic Party for both power and funding.
“Though Organizing for Action never realized his vision, it competed with the party for power and money,” the authors assert. In fact, one operative reportedly stated, “Obama destroyed that s—.”
The Aftermath: Rebuilding the Party
In the wake of Obama’s departure, significant efforts were made by Democratic stalwarts like Biden, Clinton, and former DNC Chair Donna Brazile to revive the party. Their goal? To prevent a takeover by the far-left faction and fortify the party loyalty. As per the narrative in “Fight”:
“By helping install party loyalists at the national and state committees over the course of years, these establishment Democrats kept progressive outsiders at bay. ‘You know who did that?’ said one Biden ally. ‘Bill and Hillary motherf—ing Clinton.’”
Hesitation in Endorsing Kamala Harris
Unexpectedly, the book sheds light on Obama’s reluctance to back Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential run. Speculations arose when he seemed skeptical about Harris’s ability to defeat Donald Trump, causing frustration. Ultimately, he endorsed her only five days after Biden announced his decision not to seek re-election. This delay reportedly caused tension between the two Democratic leaders.
Declining Influence: A New Political Dynamic
As the Democratic Party navigates its future, Obama’s influence appears to be diminishing. Critics suggest he might be out of touch with the appeal of modern populism and figures like Trump. Political commentator Ben Burgess pointed out that Obama’s failure to grasp the factors leading to Trump’s electoral success is symptomatic of a broader disconnect.
“Obama’s characteristic rhetorical virtues were on full display,” Burgess wrote, “but there was a massive gaping hole at the center of his speech. He still doesn’t understand why his eight years in power culminated in the rise of Trump.”
Conclusion: A Party in Flux
“Fight” uniquely captures the myriad complexities of contemporary American politics. Through in-depth interviews with more than 150 political insiders, the book not only chronicles the staggering ramifications of Obama’s presidency but also serves as a warning about the fragile state of the Democratic Party. As new champions arise, one must ponder: Can the party reclaim its cohesive strength, or has it been irrevocably altered by its most celebrated leader?
For those interested in the future of American politics, “Fight” is a must-read, providing insightful commentary on power, loyalty, and the ever-evolving landscape of the Democratic Party.
For further insights on political dynamics and party strategies, consider exploring this article that analyses the intersection of leadership and party loyalty in American politics.
