How Trump’s Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Could Steal Your Savings at the Grocery Store
When you think about President Trump’s decision to double tariffs on steel and aluminum, what’s the first thought that comes to mind? Perhaps you immediately consider the impact on manufacturing or international relations. But one critical consequence might fly under the radar: the potential spike in grocery prices.
The Economic Ripple Effect
A Promise Turned Sour
During his campaign, Trump vowed to lower prices for everyday Americans, food included. Unfortunately, his move to impose a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum is likely to have the opposite effect. Affected by this decision are not just manufacturers but you—the consumer. As David Ortega, a food economist and professor at Michigan State University, points out, tariffs on steel and aluminum are surprisingly connected to food pricing, particularly through packaging.
The Packaging Connection
Think about it: many of the canned goods you rely on, from canned tuna to pet food, utilize steel and aluminum for their packaging. In fact, nearly 70% of the tinplate steel used in food cans is imported, according to Usha Haley, a professor at the Barton School of Business at Wichita State University. With tariffs in place, companies have to absorb these increased costs, which may soon become evident in your shopping cart.
A Broader Impact
Packaging Alternatives and Rising Costs
As manufacturers grapple with these tariffs, they may look for alternative packaging materials. For instance, if companies start substituting aluminum with plastic for products like soda, the price of plastic—and everything packaged in it—could surge across the board. As Haley notes, the ripple effect extends beyond just materials:
“There are also indirect costs. The costs of transportation and maintenance on delivery trucks, for example, will rise as steel and aluminum prices increase.”
These added expenses trickle down, influencing the final prices we see when grocery shopping.
Retailers in a Bind
Balancing Act
Retailers face a tough balancing act in this scenario. John Clear, a partner at AlixPartners, emphasizes that consumers are hyper-aware of pricing hikes, which strains their trust in brands. Retailers have slim margins and limited ability to absorb rising costs. The result? They may turn to customers to cover these increases.
The Numbers Behind the Impact
Let’s break it down: if a company raises the price of a canned vegetable due to the increased packaging costs, it could translate to merely two to five cents more per can. While this may not seem significant on its own, consider that a can of sweet corn at Walmart typically costs 42 to 45 cents. An extra five cents translates to a staggering 10% increase.
This increase hits particularly hard for those relying on SNAP benefits, where every penny counts. The cumulative effect across numerous items in a shopping basket could compel families to buy one less unit of essential goods, ultimately making a frustrating situation even worse.
A Cumulative Impact
While a small bump in price might appear insignificant for one item, when multiplied across thousands of customers and stores, the effect adds up. If a major retailer like Walmart sees a slight decrease in sales for just one product, imagine the broader implications across all grocery items.
Conclusion: Prepare for Price Changes
As we navigate this evolving landscape, consider the potential adjustments in grocery prices driven by tariffs on steel and aluminum. Stay informed, budget wisely, and, as always, keep your eye on those prices—your wallet will thank you.
For further insights and updates on how economic policies affect your daily life, consider checking reputable sources like Marketplace for real-time news and expert analysis.
